Reviewing Exam Results (Approve, Flag, Reject)
Higher-risk sessions enter a review queue where staff check the event log and snapshots and record 'clear / flagged / rejected'. This decision does not automatically change the exam's pass/fail — it is kept as input for judgment.
【What the review queue is】
Sessions judged to be higher-risk, and sessions with a required webcam, are automatically added to a review queue. Check it from the review list under Admin → Recruitment → Obsyra. Viewing requires the recruitment-admin permission (admin:recruit). The list is sorted by risk, highest first.
【What you can see】
· Session info: Start/end times and the test-taker.
· Event log: A chronological list of actions recorded during the exam (tab exits, pastes, full-screen exits, etc.).
· Snapshots: For required-webcam sessions, the face snapshots and their capture times (the image storage location is not shown).
· Risk indication: How high the overall risk of the session is.
【Decisions (three)】
After reviewing, record one of:
· Clear (approve): No cheating found.
· Flagged: Possible cheating; kept as information for later judgment.
· Rejected: Judged to be cheating.
【Relation to pass/fail】
This review decision does not automatically rewrite the exam's score or pass/fail. It is simply a way for a person to check and record "whether this session shows signs of cheating". The final selection decision should be made by a person, considering both the score and the review outcome.
【Record keeping】
Events during the exam are stored as an append-only audit log and cannot be altered or deleted afterward. Actions such as viewing snapshots are also recorded.
使用範例
Open a higher-risk session and check the event log → if full-screen exits look like a brief network drop, mark 'Clear'; if there are repeated unnatural actions, mark 'Flagged'.
這篇文章對您有幫助嗎？